Update docs.

[pintos-anon] / doc / filesys.texi

@node Project 4--File Systems, Multilevel Feedback Scheduling, Project 3--Virtual Memory, Top
@chapter Project 4: File Systems

In the previous two assignments, you made extensive use of a
filesystem without actually worrying about how it was implemented
underneath.  For this last assignment, you will fill in the
implementation of the filesystem.  You will be working primarily in
the @file{filesys} directory.

You should build on the code you wrote for the previous assignments.
However, if you wish, you may turn off your VM features, as they are
not vital to making the filesystem work.  (You will need to edit
@file{filesys/Makefile.vars} to fully disable VM.)  All of the
functionality needed for project 2 (argument passing, syscalls and
multiprogramming) must work in your filesys submission.

On the other hand, one of the particular charms of working on
operating systems is being able to use what you build, and building
full-featured systems.  Therefore, you should strive to make all the
parts work together so that you can run VM and your filesystem at the
same time.  Plus, keeping VM is a great way to stress-test your
filesystem implementation.

FIXME FIXME FIXME
The first step is to understand the default filesystem provided by the
base code.  

@menu
* File System New Code::        
* Problem 4-1 Large Files::     
* Problem 4-2 File Growth::     
* Problem 4-3 Subdirectories::  
* Problem 4-4 Buffer Cache::    
* File System Design Document Requirements::  
* File System FAQs::            
@end menu

@node File System New Code
@section New Code

Here are some files that are probably new to you.  These are in the
@file{filesys} directory except where indicated:

@table @file
@item fsutil.c
Simple utilities for the filesystem that are accessible from the
kernel command line.

@item filesys.h
@itemx filesys.c
Top-level interface to the file system.

@item directory.h
@itemx directory.c
Translates file names to disk file headers; the
directory data structure is stored as a file.

@item filehdr.h
@itemx filehdr.c
Manages the data structure representing the layout of a
file's data on disk.

@item file.h
@itemx file.c
Translates file reads and writes to disk sector reads
and writes.

@item devices/disk.h
@itemx devices/disk.c
Provides access to the physical disk, abstracting away the rather
awful IDE interface.

@item lib/kernel/bitmap.h
@itemx lib/kernel/bitmap.c
A bitmap data structure along with routines for reading and writing
the bitmap to disk files.
@end table

Our file system has a Unix-like interface, so you may also wish to
read the Unix man pages for @code{creat}, @code{open}, @code{close},
@code{read}, @code{write}, @code{lseek}, and @code{unlink}.  Our file
system has calls that are similar, but not identical, to these.  The
file system translates these calls into physical disk operations.  

All the basic functionality is there in the code above, so that the
filesystem is usable right off the bat.  In fact, you've been using it
in the previous two projects.  However, it has severe limitations
which you will remove.

While most of your work will be in @file{filesys}, you should be
prepared for interactions with all previous parts (as usual).

@node Problem 4-1 Large Files
@section Problem 4-1: Large Files

Modify the file system to allow the maximum size of a file to be as
large as the disk.  You can assume that the disk will not be larger
than 8 MB.  In the basic file system, each file is limited to a file
size of just under 64 kB.  Each file has a header (@code{struct
filehdr}) that is a table of direct pointers to the disk blocks for
that file.  Since the header is stored in one disk sector, the maximum
size of a file is limited by the number of pointers that will fit in
one disk sector.  Increasing the limit to 8 MB will require you to
implement doubly-indirect blocks.

@node Problem 4-2 File Growth
@section Problem 4-2: File Growth

Implement extensible files.  In the basic file system, the file size
is specified when the file is created.  One advantage of this is that
the FileHeader data structure, once created, never changes.  In UNIX
and most other file systems, a file is initially created with size 0
and is then expanded every time a write is made off the end of the
file.  Modify the file system to allow this.  As one test case, allow
the root directory file to expand beyond its current limit of ten
files.  Make sure that concurrent accesses to the file header remain
properly synchronized.

@node Problem 4-3 Subdirectories
@section Problem 4-3: Subdirectories

Implement a hierarchical name space.  In the basic file system, all
files live in a single directory.  Modify this to allow directories to
point to either files or other directories.  To do this, you will need
to implement routines that parse path names into a sequence of
directories, as well as routines that change the current working
directory and that list the contents of the current directory.  For
performance, allow concurrent updates to different directories, but
use mutual exclusion to ensure that updates to the same directory are
performed atomically (for example, to ensure that a file is deleted
only once).

Make sure that directories can expand beyond their original size just
as any other file can.

To take advantage of hierarchical name spaces in user programs,
provide the following syscalls:

@table @code
@item SYS_chdir
@itemx bool chdir (const char *@var{dir})
Attempts to change the current working directory of the process to
@var{dir}, which may be either relative or absolute.  Returns true if
successful, false on failure.

@item SYS_mkdir
@itemx bool mkdir (const char *dir)
Attempts to create the directory named @var{dir}, which may be either
relative or absolute.  Returns true if successful, false on failure.

@item SYS_lsdir
@itemx void lsdir (void)
Prints a list of files in the current directory to @code{stdout}, one
per line.
@end table

Also write the @command{ls} and @command{mkdir} user programs.  This
is straightforward once the above syscalls are implemented.  If Unix,
these are programs rather than built-in shell commands, but
@command{cd} is a shell command.  (Why?)

@node Problem 4-4 Buffer Cache
@section Problem 4-4: Buffer Cache

Modify the file system to keep a cache of file blocks.  When a request
is made to read or write a block, check to see if it is stored in the
cache, and if so, fetch it immediately from the cache without going to
disk.  (Otherwise, fetch the block from disk into cache, evicting an
older entry if necessary.)  You are limited to a cache no greater than
64 sectors in size.  Be sure to choose an intelligent cache
replacement algorithm.  Experiment to see what combination of use,
dirty, and other information results in the best performance, as
measured by the number of disk accesses.  (For example, metadata is
generally more valuable to cache than data.)  Document your
replacement algoritm in your design document.

In addition to the basic file caching scheme, your implementation
should also include the following enhancements:

@table @b
@item write-behind:
Instead of always immediately writing modified data to disk, dirty
blocks can be kept in the cache and written out sometime later.  Your
buffer cache should write behind whenever a block is evicted from the
cache.

@item read-ahead:
Your buffer cache should automatically fetch the next block of a file
into the cache when one block of a file is read, in case that block is
about to be read.
@end table

For each of these three optimizations, design a file I/O workload that
is likely to benefit from the enhancement, explain why you expect it
to perform better than on the original file system implementation, and
demonstrate the performance improvement.

Note that write-behind makes your filesystem more fragile in the face
of crashes.  Therefore, you should implement some manner to
periodically write all cached blocks to disk.  If you have
@code{timer_sleep()} from the first project working, this is an
excellent application for it.

Likewise, read-ahead is only really useful when done asynchronously.
That is, if a process wants disk block 1 from the file, it needs to
block until disk block 1 is read in, but once that read is complete,
control should return to the process immediately while the read
request for disk block 2 is handled asynchronously.  In other words,
the process will block to wait for disk block 1, but should not block
waiting for disk block 2.

FIXME
When you're implementing this, please make sure you have a scheme for
making any read-ahead and write-behind threads halt when Pintos is
``done'' (when the user program has completed, etc), so that Pintos
will halt normally and print its various statistics.

@node File System Design Document Requirements
@section Design Document Requirements

As always, submit a design document file summarizing your design.  Be
sure to cover the following points :

@itemize @bullet
@item
How did you structure your inodes? How many blocks did you access
directly, via single-indirection, and/or via double-indirection?  Why?

@item
How did you structure your buffer cache? How did you perform a lookup
in the cache? How did you choose elements to evict from the cache?

@item
How and when did you flush the cache?
@end itemize

@node File System FAQs
@section FAQ

@enumerate 1
@item
@b{What extra credit opportunities are available for this assignment?}

@itemize @bullet
@item
We'll give out extra credit to groups that implement Unix-style
support for @file{.} and @file{..} in relative paths in their projects.

@item
We'll give some extra credit if you submit with VM enabled.  If you do
this, make sure you show us that you can run multiple programs
concurrently.  A particularly good demonstration is running
@file{capitalize} (with a reduced words file that fits comfortably on
your disk, of course).  So submit a file system disk that contains a
VM-heavy program like @file{capitalize}, so we can try it out.  And also
include the results in your test case file.

We feel that you will be much more satisfied with your cs140 ``final
product'' if you can get your VM working with your file system.  It's
also a great stress test for your FS, but obviously you have to be
pretty confident with your VM if you're going to submit this extra
credit, since you'll still lose points for failing FS-related tests,
even if the problem is in your VM code.

@item
A point of extra credit can be assigned if a user can recursively
remove directories from the shell command prompt.  Note that the
typical semantic is to just fail if a directory is not empty.
@end itemize

Make sure that you discuss any extra credit in your @file{README}
file.  We're likely to miss it if it gets buried in your design
document.

@item
@b{What exec modes for running Pintos do I absolutely need to
support?}

FIXME FIXME
The most standard mode is to run your Pintos with all the command
flags on one command line, like this: @samp{pintos -f -cp shell
shell -ex "shell"}.  However, you also need to support these flags
individually---especially since that's how the grader tests your
program.  Thus, you should be able to run the above instead as:

FIXME
@example
pintos -f
pintos -cp shell shell
pintos -ex "shell"
@end example

Note that this also provides a way for you to validate that your disks
are really persistent.  This is a common problem with a write behind
cache: if you don't shut down properly it will leave the disk in an
inconsistent state.

@item
@b{Will you test our file system with a different @code{DISK_SECTOR_SIZE}?}

No, @code{DISK_SECTOR_SIZE} will not change.

@item
@b{Will the @code{struct filehdr} take up space on the disk too?}

Yes.  Anything stored in @code{struct filehdr} takes up space on disk,
so you must include this in your calculation of how many entires will
fit in a single disk sector.

@item
File Growth FAQs

@enumerate 1
@item
@b{What is the largest file size that we are supposed to support?}

The disk we create will be 8 MB or smaller.  However, individual files
will have to be smaller than the disk to accommodate the metadata.
You'll need to consider this when deciding your @code{struct filehdr}
(inode) organization.
@end enumerate

@item
Subdirectory FAQs

@enumerate 1
@item
@b{What's the answer to the question in the spec about why
@command{ls} and @command{mkdir} are user programs, while @command{cd}
is a shell command?}

Each process maintains its own current working directory, so it's much
easier to change the current working directory of the shell process if
@command{cd} is implemented as a shell command rather than as another
user process.  In fact, Unix-like systems don't provide any way for
one process to change another process's current working directory.

@item
@b{When the spec states that directories should be able to grow beyond
ten files, does this mean that there can still be a set maximum number
of files per directory that is greater than ten, or should directories
now support unlimited growth (bounded by the maximum supported file
size)?}

We're looking for directories that can support arbitrarily large
numbers of files.  Now that directories can grow, we want you to
remove the concept of a preset maximum file limit.

@item
@b{When should the @code{lsdir} system call return?}

The @code{lsdir} system call should not return until after the
directory has been printed.  Here's a code fragment, and the desired
output:

@example
printf ("Start of directory\n");
lsdir ();
printf ("End of directory\n");
@end example

This code should create the following output:

@example
Start of directory
...  directory contents ...
End of directory
@end example

@item
@b{Do we have to implement both absolute and relative pathnames?}

Yes.  Implementing @file{.} and @file{..} is extra credit, though.

@item
@b{Should @code{remove()} also be able to remove directories?}

Yes.  The @code{remove} system call should handle removal of both
regular files and directories.  You may assume that directories can
only be deleted if they are empty, as in Unix.
@end enumerate

@item
Buffer Cache FAQs

@enumerate 1
@item
@b{We're limited to a 64-block cache, but can we also keep a copy of
each @code{struct filehdr} for an open file inside @code{struct file},
the way the stub code does?}

No, you shouldn't keep any disk sectors stored anywhere outside the
cache.  That means you'll have to change the way the file
implementation accesses its corresponding inode right now, since it
currently just creates a new @code{struct filehdr} in its constructor
and reads the corresponding sector in from disk when it's created.

There are two reasons for not storing inodes in @code{struct file}.
First, keeping extra copies of inodes would be cheating the 64-block
limitation that we place on your cache.  Second, if two processes have
the same file open, you will create a huge synchronization headache
for yourself if each @code{struct file} has its own copy of the inode.

Note that you can store pointers to inodes in @code{struct file} if
you want, and you can store some other small amount of information to
help you find the inode when you need it.

Similarly, if you want to store one block of data plus some small
amount of metadata for each of your 64 cache entries, that's fine.

@item
@b{But why can't we store copies of inodes in @code{struct file}? We
don't understand the answer to the previous question.}

The issue regarding storing @code{struct filehdr}s has to do with
implementation of the buffer cache.  Basically, you can't store a
@code{struct filehdr *} in @code{struct filehdr}.  Each time you need
to read a @code{struct filehdr}, you'll have to get it either from the
buffer cache or from disk.

If you look at @code{file_read_at()}, it uses @code{hdr} directly
without having first read in that sector from wherever it was in the
storage hierarchy.  You are no longer allowed to do this.  You will
need to change @code{file_read_at} (and similar functions) so that it
reads @code{hdr} from the storage hierarchy before using it.
@end enumerate
@end enumerate