fixed typo: "pass" should be "fail"

[pintos-anon] / doc / threads.texi

diff --git a/doc/threads.texi b/doc/threads.texi
index c1381d01dabd7107dc878e2763fe29668802cc2e..c1519e85a0df8774a0586c1c1a5d8da70ca0df66 100644 (file)
--- a/doc/threads.texi
+++ b/doc/threads.texi
@@ -633,7 +633,7 @@ does not actually mean that @func{pass} called @func{debug_panic}.  In
 fact, @func{fail} called @func{debug_panic} (via the @func{PANIC}
 macro).  GCC knows that @func{debug_panic} does not return, because it
 is declared @code{NO_RETURN} (@pxref{Function and Parameter
-Attributes}), so it doesn't include any code in @func{pass} to take
+Attributes}), so it doesn't include any code in @func{fail} to take
 control when @func{debug_panic} returns.  This means that the return
 address on the stack looks like it is at the beginning of the function
 that happens to follow @func{fail} in memory, which in this case happens
@@ -740,11 +740,9 @@ to thread @var{B} (with priority 3), then @var{B}'s new priority is 5, not 8.
 
 @item Can a thread's priority change while it is on the ready queue?
 
-Yes.  Consider this case: low-priority thread @var{L} holds a
-lock that high-priority thread @var{H} wants, so @var{H} donates its
-priority to @var{L}.  @var{L} releases the lock and
-thus loses the CPU and is moved to the ready queue.  Now @var{L}'s
-old priority is restored while it is in the ready queue.
+Yes.  Consider a ready, low-priority thread @var{L} that holds a lock.
+High-priority thread @var{H} attempts to acquire the lock and blocks,
+thereby donating its priority to ready thread @var{L}.
 
 @item Can a thread's priority change while it is blocked?