From fe829ccb26aa877de1068a3f1e237930ea8f2d34 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ben Pfaff Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 23:05:54 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] wokr on docs --- doc/statistics.texi | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/statistics.texi b/doc/statistics.texi index 351842e94e..82855902f2 100644 --- a/doc/statistics.texi +++ b/doc/statistics.texi @@ -1121,7 +1121,7 @@ When @pspp{} reads data from a file in an external format, such as a text file, variables' measurement levels are often unknown. If @code{CTABLES} runs when a variable has an unknown measurement level, it makes an initial pass through the data to guess measurement levels -using the rules described earlier in this manual (@pxref{Measurement +using the rules described in an earlier section (@pxref{Measurement Level}). Use the @code{VARIABLE LEVEL} command to set or change a variable's measurement level (@pxref{VARIABLE LEVEL}). @@ -1293,12 +1293,17 @@ Options}), or user-missing values excluded because @code{MISSING=EXCLUDE} is in effect on @code{CATEGORIES}, or system-missing values. @code{COUNT} does not count these. +@xref{CTABLES Missing Values for Summary Variables}, for details of +how @code{CTABLES} summarizes missing values. + @item @code{VALIDN} (``Valid N'', F40.0) The sum of valid count weights in included categories. -@code{VALIDN} does not count missing values regardless of whether they -are in included categories via @code{CATEGORIES}. @code{VALIDN} does -not count valid values that are in excluded categories. +For categorical variables, @code{VALIDN} does not count missing values +regardless of whether they are in included categories via +@code{CATEGORIES}. @code{VALIDN} does not count valid values that are +in excluded categories. @xref{CTABLES Missing Values for Summary +Variables}, for details. @item @code{VARIANCE} (``Variance'') The variance. @@ -1375,10 +1380,11 @@ Percentage of the sum of the values within @var{area}. @node CTABLES Summary Functions for Adjusted Weights @subsubsection Summary Functions for Adjusted Weights -If the @code{WEIGHT} subcommand specified an adjustment weight -variable, then the following summary functions use its value instead -of the dictionary weight variable. Otherwise, they are equivalent to -the summary function without the @samp{E}-prefix: +If the @code{WEIGHT} subcommand specified an effective weight variable +(@pxref{CTABLES Effective Weight}), then the following summary functions +use its value instead of the dictionary weight variable. Otherwise, +they are equivalent to the summary function without the +@samp{E}-prefix: @itemize @bullet @item @@ -1421,7 +1427,7 @@ counts: @code{UMISSING} (``Unweighted Missing'') @item -@code{UMODE} (``Unweight Mode'') +@code{UMODE} (``Unweighted Mode'') @item @code{U@i{area}PCT.SUM} (``Unweighted @i{Area} Sum %'', PCT40.1) @@ -2067,8 +2073,8 @@ By default, or with @code{HIDESOURCECATS=NO}, categories referred to by computed categories are displayed like other categories. Use @code{HIDESOURCECATS=YES} to hide them. -@node CTABLES Base Weight -@subsection Base Weight +@node CTABLES Effective Weight +@subsection Effective Weight @display @t{/WEIGHT VARIABLE=}@i{variable} @@ -2076,17 +2082,17 @@ by computed categories are displayed like other categories. Use The @code{WEIGHT} subcommand is optional and must appear before @code{TABLE}. If it appears, it must name a numeric variable, known -as the @dfn{effective base weight} or @dfn{adjustment weight}. The -effective base weight variable stands in for the dictionary's weight +as the @dfn{effective weight} or @dfn{adjustment weight}. The +effective weight variable stands in for the dictionary's weight variable (@pxref{WEIGHT}), if any, in most calculations in @code{CTABLES}. The only exceptions are the @code{COUNT}, @code{TOTALN}, and @code{VALIDN} summary functions, which use the dictionary weight instead. Weights obtained from the @pspp{} dictionary are rounded to the -nearest integer at the case level. Effective base weights are not -rounded. Regardless of the weighting source, @pspp{} does not analyze -cases with zero, missing, or negative effective weights. +nearest integer at the case level. Effective weights are not rounded. +Regardless of the weighting source, @pspp{} does not analyze cases +with zero, missing, or negative effective weights. @node CTABLES Hiding Small Counts @subsection Hiding Small Counts -- 2.30.2