From 561e72f1c85a7c52b21bdd1e76a4bc9338abb1ae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ben Pfaff Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2018 14:56:54 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] tutorial: Fix duplicate definition of node name "examine". Emacs, at least, confused this "examine" with the "EXAMINE" node for the EXAMINE command, and prevented me from visiting the latter documentation. --- doc/tutorial.texi | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/tutorial.texi b/doc/tutorial.texi index b76d8bf838..47f22cc103 100644 --- a/doc/tutorial.texi +++ b/doc/tutorial.texi @@ -376,7 +376,7 @@ seemingly bizarre height for an adult person. We can examine the data in more detail with the @cmd{EXAMINE} command (@pxref{EXAMINE}): -In @ref{examine} you can see that the lowest value of @var{height} is +In @ref{ex1} you can see that the lowest value of @var{height} is 179 (which we suspect to be erroneous), but the second lowest is 1598 which we know from the @cmd{DESCRIPTIVES} command @@ -386,7 +386,7 @@ negative but a plausible value for the second lowest value. This suggests that the two extreme values are outliers and probably represent data entry errors. -@float Example, examine +@float Example, ex1 @cartouche [@dots{} continue from @ref{descriptives}] @example @@ -448,7 +448,7 @@ From now on, they will be ignored in analysis. For detailed information about the @cmd{RECODE} command @pxref{RECODE}. If you now re-run the @cmd{DESCRIPTIVES} or @cmd{EXAMINE} commands in -@ref{descriptives} and @ref{examine} you +@ref{descriptives} and @ref{ex1} you will see a data summary with more plausible parameters. You will also notice that the data summaries indicate the two missing values. -- 2.30.2