Time-stamp: <2004-05-31 13:14:29 blp> What Ben's working on now. -------------------------- Workspace exhaustion heuristics. Does SET work correctly? Update q2c input format description. Rewrite output subsystem, break into multiple processes. CROSSTABS needs to be re-examined. RANK, which is needed for the Wilcoxon signed-rank statistic, Mann-Whitney U, Kruskal-Wallis on NPAR TESTS and for Spearman and the Johnkheere trend test (in other procedures). TODO ---- Make valgrind --leak-check=yes --show-reachable=yes work. Add Boolean type. Add NOT_REACHED() macro. Add compression to casefiles. Expressions need to be able to abbreviate function names. XDATE.QUARTER abbreviates to XDA.QUA, etc. The expression tests need tests for XDATE and a few others, see tests/xforms/expressions.sh comments for details. Expressions need random distribution functions. There needs to be another layer onto the lexer, which should probably be entirely rewritten anyway. The lexer needs to read entire *commands* at a time, not just a *line* at a time. It also needs to support arbitrary putback, probably by just backing up the "current position" in the command buffer. Scratch variables should not be available for use following TEMPORARY. Details of N OF CASES, SAMPLE, FILTER, PROCESS IF, TEMPORARY, etc., need to be checked against the documentation. See notes on these at end of file for a start. Check our results against the NIST StRD benchmark results at strd.itl.nist.gov/div898/strd In debug mode hash table code should verify that collisions are reasonably low. Use AFM files instead of Groff font files, and include AFMs for our default fonts with the distribution. Add libplot output driver. Suggested by Robert S. Maier : "it produces output in idraw-editable PS format, PCL5 format, xfig-editable format, Illustrator format,..., and can draw vector graphics on X11 displays also". Storage of value labels on disk is inefficient. Invent new data structure. Add an output flag which would cause a page break if a table segment could fit vertically on a page but it just happens to be positioned such that it won't. Fix spanned joint cells, i.e., EDLEVEL on crosstabs.stat. Cell footnotes. PostScript driver should emit thin lines, then thick lines, to optimize time and space. New functions? var_name_or_label(), tab_value_or_label() Should be able to bottom-justify cells. It'll be expensive, though, by requiring an extra metrics call. Perhaps instead of the current lines we should define the following line types: null, thin, thick, double. It might look pretty classy. Perhaps thick table borders that are cut off by a page break should decay to thin borders. (i.e., on a thick bordered table that's longer than one page, but narrow, the bottom border would be thin on the first page, and the top and bottom borders on middle pages.) Support multi-line titles on tables. (For the first page only, presumably.) Rewrite the convert_F() function in data-out.c to be nicer code. In addition to searching the source directory, we should search the current directory (for data files). (Yuck!) Fix line-too-long problems in PostScript code, instead of covering them up. setlinecap is *not* a proper solution. Need a better way than MAX_WORKSPACE to detect low-memory conditions. When malloc() returns 0, page to disk and free() unnecessary data. Remove ccase * argument from procfunc argument to procedure(). See if process_active_file() has wider applicability. Eliminate private data in struct variable through use of pointers. Fix som_columns(). Has glob.c been pared down enough? Improve interactivity of output by allowing a `commit' function for a page. This will also allow for infinite-length pages. All the tests need to be looked over. Some of the SET calls don't make sense any more. Implement thin single lines, should be pretty easy now. SELECT IF should be moved before other transformations whenever possible. It should only be impossible when one of the variables referred to in SELECT IF is created or modified by a previous transformation. The manual: add text, add index entries, add examples. The inline file should be improved: There should be *real* detection of whether it is used (in dfm.c:cmd_begin_data), not after-the-fact detection. Figure out a stylesheet for messages displayed by PSPP: i.e., what quotation marks around filenames, etc. Data input and data output are currently arranged in reciprocal pairs: input is done directly, with write_record() or whatever; output is done on a callback event-driven basis. It would definitely be easier if both could be done on a direct basis, with read_record() and write_record() routines, with a coroutine implementation (see Knuth). But I'm not sure that coroutines can be implemented in ANSI C. This will require some thought. Perhaps 0.4.0 can do this. New SET subcommand: OUTPUT. i.e., SET OUTPUT="filename" to send output to that file; SET OUTPUT="filename"(APPEND) to append to that file; SET OUTPUT=DEFAULT to reset everything. There might be a better approach, though--think about it. HDF export capabilities (http://hdf.ncsa.uiuc.edu). Suggested by Marcus G. Daniels . From Zvi Grauer and : 1. design of experiments software, specifically Factorial, response surface methodology and mixrture design. These would be EXTREMELY USEFUL for chemists, engineeris, and anyone involved in the production of chemicals or formulations. 2. Multidimensional Scaling analysis (for market analysis) - 3. Preference mapping software for market analysis 4. Hierarchical clustering (as well as partition clustering) 5. Conjoint analysis 6. Categorical data analsys ? IDEAS ----- In addition to an "infinite journal", we should keep a number of individual-session journals, pspp.jnl-1 through pspp.jnl-X, renaming and deleting as needed. All of the journals should have date/time comments. Qualifiers for variables giving type--categorical, ordinal, ... Analysis Wizard Consider consequences of xmalloc(), fail(), hcf() in interactive use: a. Can we safely just use setjmp()/longjmp()? b. Will that leak memory? i. I don't think so: all procedure-created memory is either garbage-collected or globally-accessible. ii. But you never know... esp. w/o Checker. c. Is this too early to worry? too late? Need to implement a shared buffer for funny functions that require relatively large permanent transient buffers (1024 bytes or so), that is, buffers that are permanent in the sense that they probably shouldn't be deallocated but are only used from time to time, buffers that can't be allocated on the stack because they are of variable and unpredictable but usually relatively small (usually line buffers). There are too many of these lurking around; can save a sizeable amount of space at very little overhead and with very little effort by merging them. Clever multiplatform GUI idea (due partly to John Williams): write a GUI in Java where each statistical procedure dialog box could be downloaded from the server independently. The statistical procedures would run on (the/a) server and results would be reported through HTML tables viewed with the user's choice of web browsers. Help could be implemented through the browser as well. Design a plotting API, with scatterplots, line plots, pie charts, barcharts, Pareto plots, etc., as subclasses of the plot superclass. HOWTOs ------ 1. How to add an operator for use in PSPP expressions: a. Add the operator to the enumerated type at the top of expr.h. If the operator has arguments (i.e., it's not a terminal) then add it *before* OP_TERMINAL; otherwise, add it *after* OP_TERMINAL. All these begin with OP_. b. If the operator's a terminal then you'll want to design a structure to hold its content. Add the structure to the union any_node. (You can also reuse one of the prefab structures, of course.) c. Now switch to expr-prs.c--the module for expression parsing. Insert the operator somewhere in the precedence hierarchy. (1) If you're adding a operator that is a function (like ACOS, ABS, etc.) then add the function to functab in `void init_functab(void)'. Order is not important here. The first element is the function name, like "ACOS". The second is the operator enumerator you added in expr.h, like OP_ARCOS. The third element is the C function to parse the PSPP function. The predefined functions will probably suit your needs, but if not, you can write your own. The fourth element is an argument to the parsing function; it's only used currently by generic_str_func(), which handles a rather general syntax for functions that return strings; see the comment at the beginning of its code for details. (2) If you're adding an actual operator you'll have to put a function in between two of the operators there already in functions `exprtype parse_*(any_node **n)'. Each of these stores the tree for its result into *n, and returns the result type, or EX_ERROR on error. Be sure to delete all the allocated memory on error before returning. d. Add the operator to the table `op_desc ops[OP_SENTINEL+1]' in expr-prs.c, which has an entry for every operator. These entries *must* be in the same order as they are in expr.h. The entries have the form `op(A,B,C,D)'. A is the name of the operator as it should be printed in a postfix output format. For example, the addition operator is printed as `plus'. B is a bitmapped set of flags: * Set the 001 bit (OP_VAR_ARGS) if the operator takes a variable number of arguments. If a function can take, say, two args or three args, but no other numbers of args, this is a poor way to do it--instead implement the operator as two separate operators, one with two args, the other with three. (The main effect of this bit is to cause the number of arguments to be output to the postfix form so that the expression evaluator can know how many args the operator takes. It also causes the expression optimizer to calculate the needed stack height differently, without referencing C.) * Set the 002 bit (OP_MIN_ARGS) if the operator can take an optional `dotted argument' that specified the minimum number of non-SYSMIS arguments in order to have a non-SYSMIS result. For instance, MIN.3(e1,e2,e3,e4,e5) returns a non-SYSMIS result only if at least 3 out of 5 of the expressions e1 to e5 are not missing. Minargs are passed in the nonterm_node structure in `arg[]''s elements past `n'--search expr-prs.c for the words `terrible crock' for an example of this. Minargs are output to the postfix form. A default value is output if none was specified by the user. You can use minargs for anything you want--they're not limited to actually describing a minimum number of valid arguments; that's just what they're most *commonly* used for. * Set the 004 bit (OP_FMT_SPEC) if the operator has an argument that is a format specifier. (This causes the format specifier to be output to the postfix representation.) Format specs are passed in the nonterm_node structure in the same way as minargs, except that there are three args, in this order: type, width, # of decimals--search expr-prs.c for the words `is a crock' for an example of this. * Set the 010 bit (OP_ABSORB_MISS) if the operator can *ever* have a result of other than SYSMIS when given one or more arguments of SYSMIS. Operators lacking this bit and known to have a SYSMIS argument are short-circuited to SYSMIS by the expression optimizer. * If your operator doesn't fit easily into the existing categories, congratulations, you get to write lots of code to adjust everything to cope with this new operator. Are you really sure you want to do that? C is the effect the operator has on stack height. Set this to `varies' if the operator has a variable number of arguments. Otherwise this 1, minus the number of arguments the operator has. (Since terminals have no arguments, they have a value of +1 for this; other operators have a value of 0 or less.) D is the number of items output to the postfix form after the operator proper. This is 0, plus 1 if the operator has varargs, plus 1 if the operator has minargs, plus 3 if the operator has a format spec. Note that minargs/varargs can't coexist with a format spec on the same operator as currently coded. Some terminals also have a nonzero value for this but don't fit into the above categories. e. Switch to expr-opt.c. Add code to evaluate_tree() to evaluate the expression when all arguments are known to be constants. Pseudo-random functions can't be evaluated even if their arguments are constants. If the function can be optimized even if its arguments aren't all known constants, add code to optimize_tree() to do it. f. Switch to expr-evl.c. Add code to evaluate_expression() to evaluate the expression. You must be absolutely certain that the code in evaluate_tree(), optimize_tree(), and evaluate_expression() will always return the same results, otherwise users will get inconsistent results, a Bad Thing. You must be certain that even on boundary conditions users will get identical results, for instance for the values 0, 1, -1, SYSMIS, or, for string functions, the null string, 1-char strings, and 255-char strings. g. Test the code. Write some test syntax files. Examine the output carefully. NOTES ON SEARCH ALGORITHMS -------------------------- 1. Trees are nicer when you want a sorted table. However, you can always sort a hash table after you're done adding values. 2. Brent's variation of Algorithm D is best when the table is fixed: it's memory-efficient, having small, fixed overhead. It's easier to use when you know in advance how many entries the table will contain. 3. Algorithm L is rather slow for a hash algorithm, however it's easy. 4. Chaining is best in terms of speed; ordered/self-ordering is even better. 5. Rehashing is slow. 6. Might want to decide on an algorithm empirically since there are no clear mathematical winners in some cases. 7. gprof? Hey, it works! MORE NOTES/IDEAS/BUGS --------------------- The behavior of converting a floating point to an integer when the value of the float is out of range of the integer type is UNDEFINED! See ANSI 6.2.1.3. What should we do for *negative* times in expressions? Sometimes very wide (or very tall) columns can occur in tables. What is a good way to truncate them? It doesn't seem to cause problems for the ascii or postscript drivers, but it's not good in the general case. Should they be split somehow? (One way that wide columns can occur is through user request, for instance through a wide PRINT request--try time-date.stat with a narrow ascii page or with the postscript driver on letter size paper.) NULs in input files break the products we're replacing: although it will input them properly and display them properly as AHEX format, it truncates them in A format. Also, string-manipulation functions such as CONCAT truncate their results after the first NUL. This should simplify the result of PSPP design. Perhaps those ugly a_string, b_string, ..., can all be eliminated. From Moshe Braner : An idea regarding MATCH FILES, again getting BEYOND the state of SPSS: it always bothered me that if I have a large data file and I want to match it to a small lookup table, via MATCH FILES FILE= /TABLE= /BY key, I need to SORT the large file on key, do the match, then (usually) re-sort back into the order I really want it. There is no reason to do this, when the lookup table is small. Even a dumb sequential search through the table, for every case in the big file, is better, in some cases, than the sort. So here's my idea: first look at the /TABLE file, if it is "small enough", read it into memory, and create an index (or hash table, whatever) for it. Then read the /FILE and use the index to match to each case. OTOH, if the /TABLE is too large, then do it the old way, complaining if either file is not sorted on key. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Statistical procedures: For each case we read from the input program: 1. Execute permanent transformations. If these drop the case, stop. 2. N OF CASES. If we have already written N cases, stop. 3. Write case to replacement active file. 4. Execute temporary transformations. If these drop the case, stop. 5. Post-TEMPORARY N OF CASES. If we have already analyzed N cases, stop. 6. FILTER, PROCESS IF. If these drop the case, stop. 7. Pass case to procedure. Ugly cases: LAG records cases in step 3. AGGREGATE: When output goes to an external file, this is just an ordinary procedure. When output goes to the active file, step 3 should be skipped, because AGGREGATE creates its own case sink and writes to it in step 7. Also, TEMPORARY has no effect and we just cancel it. Regardless of direction of output, we should not implement AGGREGATE through a transformation because that will fail to honor FILTER, PROCESS IF, N OF CASES. ADD FILES: Essentially an input program. It silently cancels unclosed LOOPs and DO IFs. If the active file is used for input, then runs EXECUTE (if there are any transformations) and then steals vfm_source and encapsulates it. If the active file is not used for input, then it cancels all the transformations and deletes the original active file. CASESTOVARS: ??? FLIP: MATCH FILES: Similar to AGGREGATE. This is a procedure. When the active file is used for input, it reads the active file; otherwise, it just cancels all the transformations and deletes the original active file. Step 3 should be skipped, because MATCH FILES creates its own case sink and writes to it in step 7. TEMPORARY is not allowed. MODIFY VARS: REPEATING DATA: SORT CASES: UPDATE: same as ADD FILES. VARSTOCASES: ??? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- N OF CASES * Before TEMPORARY, limits number of cases sent to the sink. * After TEMPORARY, limits number of cases sent to the procedure. * Without TEMPORARY, those are the same cases, so it limits both. SAMPLE * Sample is just a transformation. It has no special properties. FILTER * Always selects cases sent to the procedure. * No effect on cases sent to sink. * Before TEMPORARY, selection is permanent. After TEMPORARY, selection stops after a procedure. PROCESS IF * Always selects cases sent to the procedure. * No effect on cases sent to sink. * Always stops after a procedure. SPLIT FILE * Ignored by AGGREGATE. Used when procedures write matrices. * Always applies to the procedure. * Before TEMPORARY, splitting is permanent. After TEMPORARY, splitting stops after a procedure. TEMPORARY * TEMPORARY has no effect on AGGREGATE when output goes to the active file. * SORT CASES, ADD FILES, RENAME VARIABLES, CASESTOVARS, VARSTOCASES, COMPUTE with a lag function cannot be used after TEMPORARY. * Cannot be used in DO IF...END IF or LOOP...END LOOP. * FLIP ignores TEMPORARY. All transformations become permanent. * MATCH FILES and UPDATE cannot be used after TEMPORARY if active file is an input source. * RENAME VARIABLES is invalid after TEMPORARY. * WEIGHT, SPLIT FILE, N OF CASES, FILTER, PROCESS IF apply only to the next procedure when used after TEMPORARY. WEIGHT * Always applies to the procedure. * Before TEMPORARY, weighting is permanent. After TEMPORARY, weighting stops after a procedure. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Local Variables: mode: text fill-column: 79 End: