From: Ben Pfaff Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 07:58:01 +0000 (+0000) Subject: Update docs. X-Git-Url: https://pintos-os.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=pintos-anon;a=commitdiff_plain;h=806d0cd253880be54b78672581b9ff338bf2751f Update docs. --- diff --git a/doc/vm.texi b/doc/vm.texi index 299eea1..6f4428e 100644 --- a/doc/vm.texi +++ b/doc/vm.texi @@ -434,41 +434,71 @@ as a special case of file mappings.) Yes. @item -@b{How do I use the hash table provided in @file{lib/hash.c}?} +@b{How do I use the hash table provided in @file{lib/kernel/hash.c}?} + +First, you need to embed a @code{hash_elem} object as a member of the +object that the hash table will contain. Each @code{hash_elem} allows +the object to a member of at most one hash table at a given time. All +the hash table functions that deal with hash table items actually use +the address of a @code{hash_elem}. You can convert a pointer to a +@code{hash_elem} member into a pointer to the structure in which +member is embedded using the @code{hash_entry} macro. + +Second, you need to decide on a key type. The key should be something +that is unique for each object, because a given hash table may not +contain two objects with equal keys. Then you need to write two +functions. The first is a @dfn{hash function} that converts a key +into an integer. Some sample hash functions that you can use or just +examine are given in @file{lib/kernel/hash.c}. The second function +needed is a @dfn{comparison function} that compares a pair and returns +true if the first is less than the second. These two functions have +to be compatible with the prototypes for @code{hash_hash_func} and +@code{hash_less_func} in @file{lib/kernel/hash.h}. + +Here's a quick example. Suppose you want to put @code{struct thread}s +in a hash table. First, add a @code{hash_elem} to the thread +structure by adding a line to its definition: -FIXME +@example +hash_elem h_elem; /* Hash table element. */ +@end example -There are two things you need to use this hashtable: +We'll choose the @code{tid} member in @code{struct thread} as the key, +and write a hash function and a comparison function: -1. You need to decide on a key type. The key should be something -that is unique for each object as inserting two objects with -the same key will cause the second to overwrite the first. -(The keys are compared with ==, so you should stick to -integers and pointers unless you know how to do operator -overloading.) You also need to write a hash function that -converts key values to integers, which you will pass into the -hash table constructor. +@example +/* Returns a hash for E. */ +unsigned +thread_hash (const hash_elem *e, void *aux UNUSED) +@{ + struct thread *t = hash_entry (e, struct thread, h_elem); + return hash_int (t->tid); +@} -2. Your key needs to be a field of your object type, and you -will need to supply a 'get' function that given an object -returns the key. +/* Returns true if A's tid is less than B's tid. */ +bool +thread_less (const hash_elem *a_, const hash_elem *b_, void *aux UNUSED) +@{ + struct thread *a = hash_entry (a_, struct thread, h_elem); + struct thread *b = hash_entry (b_, struct thread, h_elem); + return a->tid < b->tid; +@} +@end example -Here's a quick example of how to construct a hash table. In -this table the keys are Thread pointers and the objects are -integers (you will be using different key/value pairs I'm -sure). In addition, this hash function is pretty puny. You -should probably use a better one. +Then we can create a hash table like this: @example -FIXME -@end example +struct hash threads; -and to construct the hash table: +hash_init (&threads, thread_hash, thread_less, NULL); +@end example -HashTable *htable; +Finally, if @code{@var{t}} is a pointer to a @code{struct thread}, +then we can insert it into the hash table with: -htable = new HashTable(ExtractKeyFromHashObject, - MyKeyToHashValue); +@example +hash_insert (&threads, &@var{t}->h_elem); +@end example If you have any other questions about hash tables, the CS109 and CS161 textbooks have good chapters on them, or you can come @@ -516,7 +546,6 @@ you handle a page fault in your code. @enumerate 1 @item -@item @b{Does the virtual memory system need to support growth of the stack segment?} @@ -667,5 +696,3 @@ No, once created the mapping is valid until @code{munmap} is called or the process exits. @end enumerate @end enumerate - -TLB invalidation FIXME