From e9d051142268e452b4f5f5739d05402ec64dc963 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ben Pfaff Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 03:54:00 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Suggestion from Godmar Back. --- TODO | 16 ++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) diff --git a/TODO b/TODO index 3d6ec69..9143cc7 100644 --- a/TODO +++ b/TODO @@ -1,5 +1,21 @@ -*- text -*- +From: "Godmar Back" +Subject: set_priority & donation - a TODO item +To: "Ben Pfaff" +Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 22:20:26 -0500 + +Ben, + +it seems that there are currently no tests that check the proper +behavior of thread_set_priority() when called by a thread that is +running under priority donation. The proper behavior, I assume, is to +temporarily drop the donation if the set priority is higher, and to +reassume the donation should the thread subsequently set its own +priority again to a level that's lower than a still active donation. + + - Godmar + From: Godmar Back Subject: project 4 question/comment regarding caching inode data To: Ben Pfaff -- 2.30.2