From 67bc79874ab56d1cdae56fb0c407c6332dfda727 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ben Pfaff Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 19:47:04 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Wording. --- doc/debug.texi | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/doc/debug.texi b/doc/debug.texi index e671b74..27d4f26 100644 --- a/doc/debug.texi +++ b/doc/debug.texi @@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ sense (e.g.@: function A is listed above function B, but B doesn't call A), then it's a good sign that you're corrupting a kernel thread's stack, because the backtrace is extracted from the stack. Alternatively, it could be that the @file{kernel.o} you passed to -@command{backtrace} does not correspond to the kernel that produced +@command{backtrace} is not the same kernel that produced the backtrace. Sometimes backtraces can be confusing without implying corruption. -- 2.30.2