From 34ff639aaa7fd691d2e588d46acd41669c0b5754 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ben Pfaff Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 17:55:41 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Try to make students think about performance of scheduler dispatching. Based on suggestion from Godmar Back. Also, minor wording improvements. --- doc/threads.texi | 9 +++------ doc/threads.tmpl | 11 +++++++---- 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/threads.texi b/doc/threads.texi index d83b52f..a28d7a4 100644 --- a/doc/threads.texi +++ b/doc/threads.texi @@ -675,7 +675,7 @@ list. @item If the highest-priority thread yields, does it continue running? -Yes. As long as there is a single highest-priority thread, it continues +Yes. If there is a single highest-priority thread, it continues running until it blocks or finishes, even if it calls @func{thread_yield}. If multiple threads have the same highest priority, @@ -730,9 +730,6 @@ scheduler at the same time. @item Can I use one queue instead of 64 queues? -Yes, that's fine. It's easiest to describe the algorithm in terms of 64 -separate queues, but that doesn't mean you have to implement it that -way. - -If you use a single queue, it should probably be sorted. +Yes. In general, your implementation may differ from the description, +as long as its behavior is the same. @end table diff --git a/doc/threads.tmpl b/doc/threads.tmpl index 98c5c5c..6afb34f 100644 --- a/doc/threads.tmpl +++ b/doc/threads.tmpl @@ -118,12 +118,15 @@ ticks A B C A B C to run >> table uncertain? If so, what rule did you use to resolve them? Does >> this match the behavior of your scheduler? +>> How is the way you divided the cost of scheduling between code +>> inside and outside interrupt context likely to affect performance? + ---- RATIONALE ---- ->> Critique your design, pointing out advantages and disadvantages in ->> your design choices. If you were to have extra time to work on this ->> part of the project, how might you choose to refine or improve your ->> design? +>> Briefly critique your design, pointing out advantages and +>> disadvantages in your design choices. If you were to have extra +>> time to work on this part of the project, how might you choose to +>> refine or improve your design? >> The assignment explains arithmetic for fixed-point math in detail, but >> it leaves it open to you to implement it. Why did you decide to -- 2.30.2