From: Ben Pfaff <blp@cs.stanford.edu>
Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 02:08:18 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: Add explanatory comments to threads tests.
X-Git-Url: https://pintos-os.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=94ef10ad53439c273d7c1e7397223c1cbd41f1f1;p=pintos-anon

Add explanatory comments to threads tests.
---

diff --git a/src/tests/threads/alarm-negative.c b/src/tests/threads/alarm-negative.c
index 83b3ac3..aec52cf 100644
--- a/src/tests/threads/alarm-negative.c
+++ b/src/tests/threads/alarm-negative.c
@@ -1,6 +1,4 @@
-/* Problem 1-1: Alarm Clock tests.
-
-   Tests timer_sleep(-100).  Only requirement is that it not crash. */
+/* Tests timer_sleep(-100).  Only requirement is that it not crash. */
 
 #include <stdio.h>
 #include "tests/threads/tests.h"
diff --git a/src/tests/threads/alarm-priority.c b/src/tests/threads/alarm-priority.c
index 291861f..51ca6a9 100644
--- a/src/tests/threads/alarm-priority.c
+++ b/src/tests/threads/alarm-priority.c
@@ -1,3 +1,6 @@
+/* Checks that when the alarm clock wakes up threads, the
+   higher-priority threads run first. */
+
 #include <stdio.h>
 #include "tests/threads/tests.h"
 #include "threads/init.h"
diff --git a/src/tests/threads/alarm-wait.c b/src/tests/threads/alarm-wait.c
index 1e58438..8030d20 100644
--- a/src/tests/threads/alarm-wait.c
+++ b/src/tests/threads/alarm-wait.c
@@ -1,6 +1,4 @@
-/* Problem 1-1: Alarm Clock tests.
-
-   Creates N threads, each of which sleeps a different, fixed
+/* Creates N threads, each of which sleeps a different, fixed
    duration, M times.  Records the wake-up order and verifies
    that it is valid. */
 
diff --git a/src/tests/threads/alarm-zero.c b/src/tests/threads/alarm-zero.c
index 472b9d0..c8a3ee2 100644
--- a/src/tests/threads/alarm-zero.c
+++ b/src/tests/threads/alarm-zero.c
@@ -1,6 +1,4 @@
-/* Problem 1-1: Alarm Clock tests.
-
-   Tests timer_sleep(0).  Only requirement is that it not crash. */
+/* Tests timer_sleep(0), which should return immediately. */
 
 #include <stdio.h>
 #include "tests/threads/tests.h"
diff --git a/src/tests/threads/mlfqs-fair.c b/src/tests/threads/mlfqs-fair.c
index fd8ab86..30282c3 100644
--- a/src/tests/threads/mlfqs-fair.c
+++ b/src/tests/threads/mlfqs-fair.c
@@ -1,3 +1,19 @@
+/* Measures the correctness of the "nice" implementation.
+
+   The "fair" tests run either 2 or 20 threads all niced to 0.
+   The threads should all receive approximately the same number
+   of ticks.
+
+   The mlfqs-nice-2 test runs 2 threads, one with nice 0, the
+   other with nice 5, which should receive 1,904 and 1,096 ticks,
+   respectively, over 30 seconds.
+
+   The mlfqs-nice-10 test runs 10 threads with nice 0 through 9.
+   They should receive 672, 588, 492, 408, 316, 232, 152, 92, 40,
+   and 8 ticks, respectively, over 30 seconds.
+
+   (The above are computed via simulation in mlfqs.pm.) */
+
 #include <stdio.h>
 #include <inttypes.h>
 #include "tests/threads/tests.h"
diff --git a/src/tests/threads/mlfqs-load-1.c b/src/tests/threads/mlfqs-load-1.c
index 652407c..da99729 100644
--- a/src/tests/threads/mlfqs-load-1.c
+++ b/src/tests/threads/mlfqs-load-1.c
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+/* Verifies that a single busy thread raises the load average to
+   0.5 in 38 to 45 seconds.  The expected time is 42 seconds, as
+   you can verify:
+   perl -e '$i++,$a=(59*$a+1)/60while$a<=.5;print "$i\n"'
+
+   Then, verifies that 10 seconds of inactivity drop the load
+   average back below 0.5 again. */
+
 #include <stdio.h>
 #include "tests/threads/tests.h"
 #include "threads/init.h"
diff --git a/src/tests/threads/mlfqs-load-60.c b/src/tests/threads/mlfqs-load-60.c
index 0d01cba..81caa39 100644
--- a/src/tests/threads/mlfqs-load-60.c
+++ b/src/tests/threads/mlfqs-load-60.c
@@ -1,3 +1,102 @@
+/* Starts 60 threads that each sleep for 10 seconds, then spin in
+   a tight loop for 60 seconds, and sleep for another 60 seconds.
+   Every 2 seconds after the initial sleep, the main thread
+   prints the load average.
+
+   The expected output is this (some margin of error is allowed):
+
+   After 0 seconds, load average=1.00.
+   After 2 seconds, load average=2.95.
+   After 4 seconds, load average=4.84.
+   After 6 seconds, load average=6.66.
+   After 8 seconds, load average=8.42.
+   After 10 seconds, load average=10.13.
+   After 12 seconds, load average=11.78.
+   After 14 seconds, load average=13.37.
+   After 16 seconds, load average=14.91.
+   After 18 seconds, load average=16.40.
+   After 20 seconds, load average=17.84.
+   After 22 seconds, load average=19.24.
+   After 24 seconds, load average=20.58.
+   After 26 seconds, load average=21.89.
+   After 28 seconds, load average=23.15.
+   After 30 seconds, load average=24.37.
+   After 32 seconds, load average=25.54.
+   After 34 seconds, load average=26.68.
+   After 36 seconds, load average=27.78.
+   After 38 seconds, load average=28.85.
+   After 40 seconds, load average=29.88.
+   After 42 seconds, load average=30.87.
+   After 44 seconds, load average=31.84.
+   After 46 seconds, load average=32.77.
+   After 48 seconds, load average=33.67.
+   After 50 seconds, load average=34.54.
+   After 52 seconds, load average=35.38.
+   After 54 seconds, load average=36.19.
+   After 56 seconds, load average=36.98.
+   After 58 seconds, load average=37.74.
+   After 60 seconds, load average=37.48.
+   After 62 seconds, load average=36.24.
+   After 64 seconds, load average=35.04.
+   After 66 seconds, load average=33.88.
+   After 68 seconds, load average=32.76.
+   After 70 seconds, load average=31.68.
+   After 72 seconds, load average=30.63.
+   After 74 seconds, load average=29.62.
+   After 76 seconds, load average=28.64.
+   After 78 seconds, load average=27.69.
+   After 80 seconds, load average=26.78.
+   After 82 seconds, load average=25.89.
+   After 84 seconds, load average=25.04.
+   After 86 seconds, load average=24.21.
+   After 88 seconds, load average=23.41.
+   After 90 seconds, load average=22.64.
+   After 92 seconds, load average=21.89.
+   After 94 seconds, load average=21.16.
+   After 96 seconds, load average=20.46.
+   After 98 seconds, load average=19.79.
+   After 100 seconds, load average=19.13.
+   After 102 seconds, load average=18.50.
+   After 104 seconds, load average=17.89.
+   After 106 seconds, load average=17.30.
+   After 108 seconds, load average=16.73.
+   After 110 seconds, load average=16.17.
+   After 112 seconds, load average=15.64.
+   After 114 seconds, load average=15.12.
+   After 116 seconds, load average=14.62.
+   After 118 seconds, load average=14.14.
+   After 120 seconds, load average=13.67.
+   After 122 seconds, load average=13.22.
+   After 124 seconds, load average=12.78.
+   After 126 seconds, load average=12.36.
+   After 128 seconds, load average=11.95.
+   After 130 seconds, load average=11.56.
+   After 132 seconds, load average=11.17.
+   After 134 seconds, load average=10.80.
+   After 136 seconds, load average=10.45.
+   After 138 seconds, load average=10.10.
+   After 140 seconds, load average=9.77.
+   After 142 seconds, load average=9.45.
+   After 144 seconds, load average=9.13.
+   After 146 seconds, load average=8.83.
+   After 148 seconds, load average=8.54.
+   After 150 seconds, load average=8.26.
+   After 152 seconds, load average=7.98.
+   After 154 seconds, load average=7.72.
+   After 156 seconds, load average=7.47.
+   After 158 seconds, load average=7.22.
+   After 160 seconds, load average=6.98.
+   After 162 seconds, load average=6.75.
+   After 164 seconds, load average=6.53.
+   After 166 seconds, load average=6.31.
+   After 168 seconds, load average=6.10.
+   After 170 seconds, load average=5.90.
+   After 172 seconds, load average=5.70.
+   After 174 seconds, load average=5.52.
+   After 176 seconds, load average=5.33.
+   After 178 seconds, load average=5.16.
+*/
+
 #include <stdio.h>
 #include "tests/threads/tests.h"
 #include "threads/init.h"
diff --git a/src/tests/threads/mlfqs-load-avg.c b/src/tests/threads/mlfqs-load-avg.c
index 32238c9..1462a80 100644
--- a/src/tests/threads/mlfqs-load-avg.c
+++ b/src/tests/threads/mlfqs-load-avg.c
@@ -1,3 +1,103 @@
+/* Starts 60 threads numbered 0 through 59.  Thread #i sleeps for
+   (10+i) seconds, then spins in a loop for 60 seconds, then
+   sleeps until a total of 120 seconds have passed.  Every 2
+   seconds, starting 10 seconds in, the main thread prints the
+   load average.
+
+   The expected output is this (some margin of error is allowed):
+
+   After 0 seconds, load average=0.00.
+   After 2 seconds, load average=0.05.
+   After 4 seconds, load average=0.16.
+   After 6 seconds, load average=0.34.
+   After 8 seconds, load average=0.58.
+   After 10 seconds, load average=0.87.
+   After 12 seconds, load average=1.22.
+   After 14 seconds, load average=1.63.
+   After 16 seconds, load average=2.09.
+   After 18 seconds, load average=2.60.
+   After 20 seconds, load average=3.16.
+   After 22 seconds, load average=3.76.
+   After 24 seconds, load average=4.42.
+   After 26 seconds, load average=5.11.
+   After 28 seconds, load average=5.85.
+   After 30 seconds, load average=6.63.
+   After 32 seconds, load average=7.46.
+   After 34 seconds, load average=8.32.
+   After 36 seconds, load average=9.22.
+   After 38 seconds, load average=10.15.
+   After 40 seconds, load average=11.12.
+   After 42 seconds, load average=12.13.
+   After 44 seconds, load average=13.16.
+   After 46 seconds, load average=14.23.
+   After 48 seconds, load average=15.33.
+   After 50 seconds, load average=16.46.
+   After 52 seconds, load average=17.62.
+   After 54 seconds, load average=18.81.
+   After 56 seconds, load average=20.02.
+   After 58 seconds, load average=21.26.
+   After 60 seconds, load average=22.52.
+   After 62 seconds, load average=23.71.
+   After 64 seconds, load average=24.80.
+   After 66 seconds, load average=25.78.
+   After 68 seconds, load average=26.66.
+   After 70 seconds, load average=27.45.
+   After 72 seconds, load average=28.14.
+   After 74 seconds, load average=28.75.
+   After 76 seconds, load average=29.27.
+   After 78 seconds, load average=29.71.
+   After 80 seconds, load average=30.06.
+   After 82 seconds, load average=30.34.
+   After 84 seconds, load average=30.55.
+   After 86 seconds, load average=30.68.
+   After 88 seconds, load average=30.74.
+   After 90 seconds, load average=30.73.
+   After 92 seconds, load average=30.66.
+   After 94 seconds, load average=30.52.
+   After 96 seconds, load average=30.32.
+   After 98 seconds, load average=30.06.
+   After 100 seconds, load average=29.74.
+   After 102 seconds, load average=29.37.
+   After 104 seconds, load average=28.95.
+   After 106 seconds, load average=28.47.
+   After 108 seconds, load average=27.94.
+   After 110 seconds, load average=27.36.
+   After 112 seconds, load average=26.74.
+   After 114 seconds, load average=26.07.
+   After 116 seconds, load average=25.36.
+   After 118 seconds, load average=24.60.
+   After 120 seconds, load average=23.81.
+   After 122 seconds, load average=23.02.
+   After 124 seconds, load average=22.26.
+   After 126 seconds, load average=21.52.
+   After 128 seconds, load average=20.81.
+   After 130 seconds, load average=20.12.
+   After 132 seconds, load average=19.46.
+   After 134 seconds, load average=18.81.
+   After 136 seconds, load average=18.19.
+   After 138 seconds, load average=17.59.
+   After 140 seconds, load average=17.01.
+   After 142 seconds, load average=16.45.
+   After 144 seconds, load average=15.90.
+   After 146 seconds, load average=15.38.
+   After 148 seconds, load average=14.87.
+   After 150 seconds, load average=14.38.
+   After 152 seconds, load average=13.90.
+   After 154 seconds, load average=13.44.
+   After 156 seconds, load average=13.00.
+   After 158 seconds, load average=12.57.
+   After 160 seconds, load average=12.15.
+   After 162 seconds, load average=11.75.
+   After 164 seconds, load average=11.36.
+   After 166 seconds, load average=10.99.
+   After 168 seconds, load average=10.62.
+   After 170 seconds, load average=10.27.
+   After 172 seconds, load average=9.93.
+   After 174 seconds, load average=9.61.
+   After 176 seconds, load average=9.29.
+   After 178 seconds, load average=8.98.
+*/
+
 #include <stdio.h>
 #include "tests/threads/tests.h"
 #include "threads/init.h"
diff --git a/src/tests/threads/mlfqs-recent-1.c b/src/tests/threads/mlfqs-recent-1.c
index 727bcb1..c217f83 100644
--- a/src/tests/threads/mlfqs-recent-1.c
+++ b/src/tests/threads/mlfqs-recent-1.c
@@ -1,3 +1,100 @@
+/* Checks that recent_cpu is calculated properly for the case of
+   a single ready process.
+
+   The expected output is this (some margin of error is allowed):
+
+   After 2 seconds, recent_cpu is 6.40, load_avg is 0.03.
+   After 4 seconds, recent_cpu is 12.60, load_avg is 0.07.
+   After 6 seconds, recent_cpu is 18.61, load_avg is 0.10.
+   After 8 seconds, recent_cpu is 24.44, load_avg is 0.13.
+   After 10 seconds, recent_cpu is 30.08, load_avg is 0.15.
+   After 12 seconds, recent_cpu is 35.54, load_avg is 0.18.
+   After 14 seconds, recent_cpu is 40.83, load_avg is 0.21.
+   After 16 seconds, recent_cpu is 45.96, load_avg is 0.24.
+   After 18 seconds, recent_cpu is 50.92, load_avg is 0.26.
+   After 20 seconds, recent_cpu is 55.73, load_avg is 0.29.
+   After 22 seconds, recent_cpu is 60.39, load_avg is 0.31.
+   After 24 seconds, recent_cpu is 64.90, load_avg is 0.33.
+   After 26 seconds, recent_cpu is 69.27, load_avg is 0.35.
+   After 28 seconds, recent_cpu is 73.50, load_avg is 0.38.
+   After 30 seconds, recent_cpu is 77.60, load_avg is 0.40.
+   After 32 seconds, recent_cpu is 81.56, load_avg is 0.42.
+   After 34 seconds, recent_cpu is 85.40, load_avg is 0.44.
+   After 36 seconds, recent_cpu is 89.12, load_avg is 0.45.
+   After 38 seconds, recent_cpu is 92.72, load_avg is 0.47.
+   After 40 seconds, recent_cpu is 96.20, load_avg is 0.49.
+   After 42 seconds, recent_cpu is 99.57, load_avg is 0.51.
+   After 44 seconds, recent_cpu is 102.84, load_avg is 0.52.
+   After 46 seconds, recent_cpu is 106.00, load_avg is 0.54.
+   After 48 seconds, recent_cpu is 109.06, load_avg is 0.55.
+   After 50 seconds, recent_cpu is 112.02, load_avg is 0.57.
+   After 52 seconds, recent_cpu is 114.89, load_avg is 0.58.
+   After 54 seconds, recent_cpu is 117.66, load_avg is 0.60.
+   After 56 seconds, recent_cpu is 120.34, load_avg is 0.61.
+   After 58 seconds, recent_cpu is 122.94, load_avg is 0.62.
+   After 60 seconds, recent_cpu is 125.46, load_avg is 0.64.
+   After 62 seconds, recent_cpu is 127.89, load_avg is 0.65.
+   After 64 seconds, recent_cpu is 130.25, load_avg is 0.66.
+   After 66 seconds, recent_cpu is 132.53, load_avg is 0.67.
+   After 68 seconds, recent_cpu is 134.73, load_avg is 0.68.
+   After 70 seconds, recent_cpu is 136.86, load_avg is 0.69.
+   After 72 seconds, recent_cpu is 138.93, load_avg is 0.70.
+   After 74 seconds, recent_cpu is 140.93, load_avg is 0.71.
+   After 76 seconds, recent_cpu is 142.86, load_avg is 0.72.
+   After 78 seconds, recent_cpu is 144.73, load_avg is 0.73.
+   After 80 seconds, recent_cpu is 146.54, load_avg is 0.74.
+   After 82 seconds, recent_cpu is 148.29, load_avg is 0.75.
+   After 84 seconds, recent_cpu is 149.99, load_avg is 0.76.
+   After 86 seconds, recent_cpu is 151.63, load_avg is 0.76.
+   After 88 seconds, recent_cpu is 153.21, load_avg is 0.77.
+   After 90 seconds, recent_cpu is 154.75, load_avg is 0.78.
+   After 92 seconds, recent_cpu is 156.23, load_avg is 0.79.
+   After 94 seconds, recent_cpu is 157.67, load_avg is 0.79.
+   After 96 seconds, recent_cpu is 159.06, load_avg is 0.80.
+   After 98 seconds, recent_cpu is 160.40, load_avg is 0.81.
+   After 100 seconds, recent_cpu is 161.70, load_avg is 0.81.
+   After 102 seconds, recent_cpu is 162.96, load_avg is 0.82.
+   After 104 seconds, recent_cpu is 164.18, load_avg is 0.83.
+   After 106 seconds, recent_cpu is 165.35, load_avg is 0.83.
+   After 108 seconds, recent_cpu is 166.49, load_avg is 0.84.
+   After 110 seconds, recent_cpu is 167.59, load_avg is 0.84.
+   After 112 seconds, recent_cpu is 168.66, load_avg is 0.85.
+   After 114 seconds, recent_cpu is 169.69, load_avg is 0.85.
+   After 116 seconds, recent_cpu is 170.69, load_avg is 0.86.
+   After 118 seconds, recent_cpu is 171.65, load_avg is 0.86.
+   After 120 seconds, recent_cpu is 172.58, load_avg is 0.87.
+   After 122 seconds, recent_cpu is 173.49, load_avg is 0.87.
+   After 124 seconds, recent_cpu is 174.36, load_avg is 0.88.
+   After 126 seconds, recent_cpu is 175.20, load_avg is 0.88.
+   After 128 seconds, recent_cpu is 176.02, load_avg is 0.88.
+   After 130 seconds, recent_cpu is 176.81, load_avg is 0.89.
+   After 132 seconds, recent_cpu is 177.57, load_avg is 0.89.
+   After 134 seconds, recent_cpu is 178.31, load_avg is 0.89.
+   After 136 seconds, recent_cpu is 179.02, load_avg is 0.90.
+   After 138 seconds, recent_cpu is 179.72, load_avg is 0.90.
+   After 140 seconds, recent_cpu is 180.38, load_avg is 0.90.
+   After 142 seconds, recent_cpu is 181.03, load_avg is 0.91.
+   After 144 seconds, recent_cpu is 181.65, load_avg is 0.91.
+   After 146 seconds, recent_cpu is 182.26, load_avg is 0.91.
+   After 148 seconds, recent_cpu is 182.84, load_avg is 0.92.
+   After 150 seconds, recent_cpu is 183.41, load_avg is 0.92.
+   After 152 seconds, recent_cpu is 183.96, load_avg is 0.92.
+   After 154 seconds, recent_cpu is 184.49, load_avg is 0.92.
+   After 156 seconds, recent_cpu is 185.00, load_avg is 0.93.
+   After 158 seconds, recent_cpu is 185.49, load_avg is 0.93.
+   After 160 seconds, recent_cpu is 185.97, load_avg is 0.93.
+   After 162 seconds, recent_cpu is 186.43, load_avg is 0.93.
+   After 164 seconds, recent_cpu is 186.88, load_avg is 0.94.
+   After 166 seconds, recent_cpu is 187.31, load_avg is 0.94.
+   After 168 seconds, recent_cpu is 187.73, load_avg is 0.94.
+   After 170 seconds, recent_cpu is 188.14, load_avg is 0.94.
+   After 172 seconds, recent_cpu is 188.53, load_avg is 0.94.
+   After 174 seconds, recent_cpu is 188.91, load_avg is 0.95.
+   After 176 seconds, recent_cpu is 189.27, load_avg is 0.95.
+   After 178 seconds, recent_cpu is 189.63, load_avg is 0.95.
+   After 180 seconds, recent_cpu is 189.97, load_avg is 0.95.
+*/   
+
 #include <stdio.h>
 #include "tests/threads/tests.h"
 #include "threads/init.h"
@@ -7,7 +104,7 @@
 #include "devices/timer.h"
 
 /* Sensitive to assumption that recent_cpu updates happen exactly
-   when timer_ticks()%TIMER_FREQ == 0. */
+   when timer_ticks() % TIMER_FREQ == 0. */
 
 void
 test_mlfqs_recent_1 (void) 
diff --git a/src/tests/threads/priority-condvar.c b/src/tests/threads/priority-condvar.c
index 0d34380..51008ab 100644
--- a/src/tests/threads/priority-condvar.c
+++ b/src/tests/threads/priority-condvar.c
@@ -1,3 +1,6 @@
+/* Tests that cond_signal() wakes up the highest-priority thread
+   waiting in cond_wait(). */
+
 #include <stdio.h>
 #include "tests/threads/tests.h"
 #include "threads/init.h"
diff --git a/src/tests/threads/priority-donate-multiple.c b/src/tests/threads/priority-donate-multiple.c
index 836f3ed..6905691 100644
--- a/src/tests/threads/priority-donate-multiple.c
+++ b/src/tests/threads/priority-donate-multiple.c
@@ -1,4 +1,10 @@
-/* Based on a test originally submitted for Stanford's CS 140 in
+/* The main thread acquires locks A and B, then it creates two
+   higher-priority threads.  Each of these threads blocks
+   acquiring one of the locks and thus donate their priority to
+   the main thread.  The main thread releases the locks in turn
+   and relinquishes its donated priorities.
+   
+   Based on a test originally submitted for Stanford's CS 140 in
    winter 1999 by Matt Franklin <startled@leland.stanford.edu>,
    Greg Hutchins <gmh@leland.stanford.edu>, Yu Ping Hu
    <yph@cs.stanford.edu>.  Modified by arens. */
diff --git a/src/tests/threads/priority-donate-nest.c b/src/tests/threads/priority-donate-nest.c
index 15141b7..1f24584 100644
--- a/src/tests/threads/priority-donate-nest.c
+++ b/src/tests/threads/priority-donate-nest.c
@@ -1,4 +1,10 @@
-/* Based on a test originally submitted for Stanford's CS 140 in
+/* Low-priority main thread L acquires lock A.  Medium-priority
+   thread M then acquires lock B then blocks on acquiring lock A.
+   High-priority thread H then blocks on acquiring lock B.  Thus,
+   thread H donates its priority to M, which in turn donates it
+   to thread L.
+   
+   Based on a test originally submitted for Stanford's CS 140 in
    winter 1999 by Matt Franklin <startled@leland.stanford.edu>,
    Greg Hutchins <gmh@leland.stanford.edu>, Yu Ping Hu
    <yph@cs.stanford.edu>.  Modified by arens. */
diff --git a/src/tests/threads/priority-donate-one.c b/src/tests/threads/priority-donate-one.c
index d3b3d96..603a7fe 100644
--- a/src/tests/threads/priority-donate-one.c
+++ b/src/tests/threads/priority-donate-one.c
@@ -1,4 +1,10 @@
-/* Based on a test originally submitted for Stanford's CS 140 in
+/* The main thread acquires a lock.  Then it creates two
+   higher-priority threads that block acquiring the lock, causing
+   them to donate their priorities to the main thread.  When the
+   main thread releases the lock, the other threads should
+   acquire it in priority order.
+
+   Based on a test originally submitted for Stanford's CS 140 in
    winter 1999 by Matt Franklin <startled@leland.stanford.edu>,
    Greg Hutchins <gmh@leland.stanford.edu>, Yu Ping Hu
    <yph@cs.stanford.edu>.  Modified by arens. */
diff --git a/src/tests/threads/priority-fifo.c b/src/tests/threads/priority-fifo.c
index 541cf5a..e71b7e5 100644
--- a/src/tests/threads/priority-fifo.c
+++ b/src/tests/threads/priority-fifo.c
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
-/* Problem 1-3: Priority Scheduling tests.
+/* Creates several threads all at the same priority and ensures
+   that they consistently run in the same round-robin order.
 
    Based on a test originally submitted for Stanford's CS 140 in
    winter 1999 by by Matt Franklin
diff --git a/src/tests/threads/priority-fifo.ck b/src/tests/threads/priority-fifo.ck
index 2407e54..a5322ec 100644
--- a/src/tests/threads/priority-fifo.ck
+++ b/src/tests/threads/priority-fifo.ck
@@ -1,4 +1,27 @@
 # -*- perl -*-
+
+# The expected output looks like this:
+#
+# (priority-fifo) iteration: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
+# (priority-fifo) iteration: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
+# (priority-fifo) iteration: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
+# (priority-fifo) iteration: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
+# (priority-fifo) iteration: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
+# (priority-fifo) iteration: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
+# (priority-fifo) iteration: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
+# (priority-fifo) iteration: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
+# (priority-fifo) iteration: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
+# (priority-fifo) iteration: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
+# (priority-fifo) iteration: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
+# (priority-fifo) iteration: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
+# (priority-fifo) iteration: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
+# (priority-fifo) iteration: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
+# (priority-fifo) iteration: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
+# (priority-fifo) iteration: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
+#
+# A different permutation of 0...15 is acceptable, but every line must
+# be in the same order.
+
 use strict;
 use warnings;
 use tests::tests;
diff --git a/src/tests/threads/priority-preempt.c b/src/tests/threads/priority-preempt.c
index f6f799c..452c680 100644
--- a/src/tests/threads/priority-preempt.c
+++ b/src/tests/threads/priority-preempt.c
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/* Problem 1-3: Priority Scheduling tests.
+/* Ensures that a high-priority thread really preempts.
 
    Based on a test originally submitted for Stanford's CS 140 in
    winter 1999 by by Matt Franklin
diff --git a/src/tests/threads/priority-sema.c b/src/tests/threads/priority-sema.c
index 743b05a..8ca17a0 100644
--- a/src/tests/threads/priority-sema.c
+++ b/src/tests/threads/priority-sema.c
@@ -1,3 +1,6 @@
+/* Tests that the highest-priority thread waiting on a semaphore
+   is the first to wake up. */
+
 #include <stdio.h>
 #include "tests/threads/tests.h"
 #include "threads/init.h"