+2010-09-08 Jim Meyering <meyering@redhat.com>
+
+ init.sh: penalize a set-x-impaired shell; don't disqualify it
+ * tests/init.sh: Too many shells corrupt application stderr when
+ you set -x, so we can't afford to disqualify them, since at least
+ on Irix-6.5, that would disqualify all bourne shells.
+ Instead, use a two-pass approach.
+ On the first pass, try to find a shell that meets the stricter
+ condition that set -x does not corrupt stderr.
+ If no shell meets the stricter condition, retest each candidate
+ shell, but without that extra condition. Finally, when
+ VERBOSE=yes is requested and set -x might cause trouble, simply
+ issue a warning and refrain from enabling debug output.
+
2010-09-08 Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
unsetenv: fix OpenBSD bug
# Use "9" to indicate success (rather than 0), in case some shell acts
# like Solaris 10's /bin/sh but exits successfully instead of with status 2.
+# Eval this code in a subshell to determine a shell's suitability.
+# 10 - passes all tests; ok to use
+# 9 - ok, but enabling "set -x" corrupts application stderr; prefer higher score
+# ? - not ok
gl_shell_test_script_='
test $(echo y) = y || exit 1
-test -z "$( (exec 3>&1; set -x; P=1 true 2>&3) 2> /dev/null)" || exit 1
-test -z "$EXEEXT" && exit 9
+score_=10
+if test "$VERBOSE" = yes; then
+ test -n "$( (exec 3>&1; set -x; P=1 true 2>&3) 2> /dev/null)" && score_=9
+fi
+test -z "$EXEEXT" && exit $score_
shopt -s expand_aliases
alias a-b="echo zoo"
v=abx
test ${v%x} = ab \
&& test ${v#a} = bx \
&& test $(a-b) = zoo \
- && exit 9
+ && exit $score_
'
if test "x$1" = "x--no-reexec"; then
shift
else
- # 'eval'ing the above code makes Solaris 10's /bin/sh exit with $? set to 2.
- # It does not evaluate any of the code after the "unexpected" `('. Thus,
- # we must run it in a subshell.
- ( eval "$gl_shell_test_script_" ) > /dev/null 2>&1
- if test $? = 9; then
- : # The current shell is adequate. No re-exec required.
- else
- # Search for a shell that meets our requirements.
- for re_shell_ in "${CONFIG_SHELL:-no_shell}" /bin/sh bash dash zsh pdksh fail
- do
- test "$re_shell_" = no_shell && continue
- test "$re_shell_" = fail && skip_ failed to find an adequate shell
+ # Assume a working shell. Export to subshells (setup_ needs this).
+ gl_set_x_corrupts_stderr_=false
+ export gl_set_x_corrupts_stderr_
+
+ # Record the first marginally acceptable shell.
+ marginal_=
+
+ # Search for a shell that meets our requirements.
+ for re_shell_ in __current__ "${CONFIG_SHELL:-no_shell}" \
+ /bin/sh bash dash zsh pdksh fail
+ do
+ test "$re_shell_" = no_shell && continue
+
+ # If we've made it all the way to the sentinel, "fail" without
+ # finding even a marginal shell, skip this test.
+ if test "$re_shell_" = fail; then
+ test -z "$marginal_" && skip_ failed to find an adequate shell
+ re_shell_=$marginal_
+ break
+ fi
+
+ # When testing the current shell, simply "eval" the test code.
+ # Otherwise, run it via $re_shell_ -c ...
+ if test "$re_shell_" = __current__; then
+ # 'eval'ing this code makes Solaris 10's /bin/sh exit with
+ # $? set to 2. It does not evaluate any of the code after the
+ # "unexpected" first `('. Thus, we must run it in a subshell.
+ ( eval "$gl_shell_test_script_" ) > /dev/null 2>&1
+ else
"$re_shell_" -c "$gl_shell_test_script_" 2>/dev/null
- if test $? = 9; then
- # Found an acceptable shell. Preserve -v and -x.
- case $- in
- *v*x* | *x*v*) opts_=-vx ;;
- *v*) opts_=-v ;;
- *x*) opts_=-x ;;
- *) opts_= ;;
- esac
- exec "$re_shell_" $opts_ "$0" --no-reexec "$@"
- echo "$ME_: exec failed" 1>&2
- exit 127
- fi
- done
+ fi
+
+ st_=$?
+
+ # $re_shell_ works just fine. Use it.
+ test $st_ = 10 && break
+
+ # If this is our first marginally acceptable shell, remember it.
+ if test "$st_:$marginal_" = 9: ; then
+ marginal_="$re_shell_"
+ gl_set_x_corrupts_stderr_=true
+ fi
+ done
+
+ if test "$re_shell_" != __current__; then
+ # Found a usable shell. Preserve -v and -x.
+ case $- in
+ *v*x* | *x*v*) opts_=-vx ;;
+ *v*) opts_=-v ;;
+ *x*) opts_=-x ;;
+ *) opts_= ;;
+ esac
+ exec "$re_shell_" $opts_ "$0" --no-reexec "$@"
+ echo "$ME_: exec failed" 1>&2
+ exit 127
fi
fi
setup_()
{
- test "$VERBOSE" = yes && set -x
+ if test "$VERBOSE" = yes; then
+ # Test whether set -x may cause the selected shell to corrupt an
+ # application's stderr. Many do, including zsh-4.3.10 and the /bin/sh
+ # from SunOS 5.11, OpenBSD 4.7 and Irix 5.x and 6.5.
+ # If enabling verbose output this way would cause trouble, simply
+ # issue a warning and refrain.
+ if $gl_set_x_corrupts_stderr_; then
+ warn_ "using SHELL=$SHELL with 'set -x' corrupts stderr"
+ else
+ set -x
+ fi
+ fi
initial_cwd_=$PWD