X-Git-Url: https://pintos-os.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=blobdiff_plain;f=doc%2Fthreads.texi;h=eeb17eeac26298c6728c1349abbb5bc3a12f1222;hb=ea69fc9dbb8d947fbec0e78fe266c6402c112731;hp=d0d34e407bc7de0120f73ff9edd702add0e9cd3d;hpb=f415a37905c57f61b444806bf84f5405184452aa;p=pintos-anon

diff --git a/doc/threads.texi b/doc/threads.texi
index d0d34e4..eeb17ee 100644
--- a/doc/threads.texi
+++ b/doc/threads.texi
@@ -609,13 +609,13 @@ to cause many of the tests to fail.
 You are probably looking at a backtrace that looks something like this:
 
 @example
-0xc0108810: debug_panic (../../lib/kernel/debug.c:32)
-0xc010a99f: pass (../../tests/threads/tests.c:93)
-0xc010bdd3: test_mlfqs_load_1 (../../tests/threads/mlfqs-load-1.c:33)
-0xc010a8cf: run_test (../../tests/threads/tests.c:51)
-0xc0100452: run_task (../../threads/init.c:283)
-0xc0100536: run_actions (../../threads/init.c:333)
-0xc01000bb: main (../../threads/init.c:137)
+0xc0108810: debug_panic (lib/kernel/debug.c:32)
+0xc010a99f: pass (tests/threads/tests.c:93)
+0xc010bdd3: test_mlfqs_load_1 (...threads/mlfqs-load-1.c:33)
+0xc010a8cf: run_test (tests/threads/tests.c:51)
+0xc0100452: run_task (threads/init.c:283)
+0xc0100536: run_actions (threads/init.c:333)
+0xc01000bb: main (threads/init.c:137)
 @end example
 
 This is just confusing output from the @command{backtrace} program.  It
@@ -697,6 +697,13 @@ priority to @var{L}.  @var{L} releases the lock and
 thus loses the CPU and is moved to the ready queue.  Now @var{L}'s
 old priority is restored while it is in the ready queue.
 
+@item Can a thread's priority change while it is blocked?
+
+Yes.  While a thread that has acquired lock @var{L} is blocked for any
+reason, its priority can increase by priority donation if a
+higher-priority thread attempts to acquire @var{L}.  This case is
+checked by the @code{priority-donate-sema} test.
+
 @item Can a thread added to the ready list preempt the processor?
 
 Yes.  If a thread added to the ready list has higher priority than the
@@ -707,9 +714,11 @@ preempting whatever thread is currently running.
 
 @item How does @func{thread_set_priority} affect a thread receiving donations?
 
-It should do something sensible, but no particular behavior is
-required.  None of the test cases call @func{thread_set_priority} from a
-thread while it is receiving a priority donation.
+It sets the thread's base priority.  The thread's effective priority
+becomes the higher of the newly set priority or the highest donated
+priority.  When the donations are released, the thread's priority
+becomes the one set through the function call.  This behavior is checked
+by the @code{priority-donate-lower} test.
 
 @item Calling @func{printf} in @func{sema_up} or @func{sema_down} reboots!