X-Git-Url: https://pintos-os.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=blobdiff_plain;f=doc%2Fthreads.texi;h=d83b52f4525770b2a89d7768713426e1ad1821b0;hb=c7ceee91c04fa72da655c00cb82302537ff6c9eb;hp=ced5ae87aa5ff3e64c4b281851df71920ad6ecbd;hpb=27d056017e9085a699621ce3075eeb11f145c4ba;p=pintos-anon

diff --git a/doc/threads.texi b/doc/threads.texi
index ced5ae8..d83b52f 100644
--- a/doc/threads.texi
+++ b/doc/threads.texi
@@ -76,11 +76,11 @@ assembly code.  (You don't have to understand it.)  It saves the
 state of the currently running thread and restores the state of the
 thread we're switching to.
 
-Using the @command{gdb} debugger, slowly trace through a context
-switch to see what happens (@pxref{gdb}).  You can set a
+Using the GDB debugger, slowly trace through a context
+switch to see what happens (@pxref{GDB}).  You can set a
 breakpoint on @func{schedule} to start out, and then
-single-step from there.@footnote{@command{gdb} might tell you that
-@func{schedule} doesn't exist, which is arguably a @command{gdb} bug.
+single-step from there.@footnote{GDB might tell you that
+@func{schedule} doesn't exist, which is arguably a GDB bug.
 You can work around this by setting the breakpoint by filename and
 line number, e.g.@: @code{break thread.c:@var{ln}} where @var{ln} is
 the line number of the first declaration in @func{schedule}.}  Be sure
@@ -328,9 +328,10 @@ timer ticks or input events.  Turning off interrupts also increases the
 interrupt handling latency, which can make a machine feel sluggish if
 taken too far.
 
-You may need to add or modify code where interrupts are already
-disabled, such as in @func{sema_up} or @func{sema_down}.  You should
-still try to keep this code as short as you can.
+The synchronization primitives themselves in @file{synch.c} are
+implemented by disabling interrupts.  You may need to increase the
+amount of code that runs with interrupts disabled here, but you should
+still try to keep it to a minimum.
 
 Disabling interrupts can be useful for debugging, if you want to make
 sure that a section of code is not interrupted.  You should remove
@@ -441,8 +442,8 @@ priority such that it no longer has the highest priority must cause it
 to immediately yield the CPU.
 
 Thread priorities range from @code{PRI_MIN} (0) to @code{PRI_MAX} (63).
-Lower numbers correspond to @emph{higher} priorities, so that priority 0
-is the highest priority and priority 63 is the lowest.
+Lower numbers correspond to lower priorities, so that priority 0
+is the lowest priority and priority 63 is the highest.
 The initial thread priority is passed as an argument to
 @func{thread_create}.  If there's no reason to choose another
 priority, use @code{PRI_DEFAULT} (31).  The @code{PRI_} macros are
@@ -511,8 +512,8 @@ must be active, but we must be able to choose the 4.4@acronym{BSD}
 scheduler
 with the @option{-mlfqs} kernel option.  Passing this
 option sets @code{enable_mlfqs}, declared in @file{threads/init.h}, to
-true, when the options are parsed by @func{parse_options}, which happens
-through midway through @func{main}.
+true when the options are parsed by @func{parse_options}, which happens
+midway through @func{main}.
 
 When the 4.4@acronym{BSD} scheduler is enabled, threads no longer
 directly control their own priorities.  The @var{priority} argument to
@@ -547,6 +548,8 @@ modified by the reference solution.
  5 files changed, 440 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
 @end verbatim
 
+@file{fixed-point.h} is a new file added by the reference solution.
+
 @item How do I update the @file{Makefile}s when I add a new source file?
 
 @anchor{Adding Source Files}
@@ -682,8 +685,8 @@ If multiple threads have the same highest priority,
 
 Priority donation only changes the priority of the donee
 thread.  The donor thread's priority is unchanged.  
-Priority donation is not additive: if thread @var{A} (with priority 3) donates
-to thread @var{B} (with priority 5), then @var{B}'s new priority is 3, not 8.
+Priority donation is not additive: if thread @var{A} (with priority 5) donates
+to thread @var{B} (with priority 3), then @var{B}'s new priority is 5, not 8.
 
 @item Can a thread's priority change while it is on the ready queue?